Generally speaking, the lens should expose one thing in regards to the initial or “target” text that will never be otherwise obvious. Instead, your analysis might call the legitimacy of this arguments associated with lens piece into concern, expand the arguments for the lens text, or provoke various other reevaluation associated with the two texts. In either case, you’ll be producing a“dialogue that is critical texts.”
Reading the Texts
You read them is crucial since you will eventually want to hone in on points of commonality and discord between the two texts, the order and manner in which.
First, read the lens text to determine the core that is author’s and language. Since theoretical or critical texts are generally thick and complex, it could be useful to develop an overview of this author’s points that are primary. According the to Brandeis Writing Program Handbook, a lens that is valuable will “grapple with central a few ideas” of this lens text, in the place of coping with remote quotes that could or may possibly not be indicative associated with the author’s argument all together. As a result, it is crucial to ensure that you certainly comprehend and will articulate the author’s details before continuing into the target text.
Then, quickly see the target text to produce an idea that is general of content. Then, think about: Where do we see basic points of contract or disagreement involving the two texts? Which of this lens text’s arguments that are main be reproduced to your target text? It may possibly be more straightforward to give attention to 1 or 2 of the lens text’s arguments that are central. Continue reading “This handout provides suggestions for writing papers or reactions that request you to evaluate a text through the lens of a vital or theoretical additional supply.”